The one of Brazil, X and Starlink This is just the latest case of Elon Musk becoming a disruptive force in global geopolitics, transcending the traditional role of business moguls. Musk is not just another one.
His influence not only emanates from his wealthsino also the control of companies that complement each other to boost their relevance. Especially those that it almost completely controls, those that are not listed on the stock exchange: X, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI…
This combination of Musk's technological, financial and media power makes him an unprecedented geopolitical agent. It is capable of influencing international conflicts, relations between superpowers and debates on freedom of expression on a global scale. Some examples:
We can go deeper. Starlink is proving to be a double-edged sword. It was vital in keeping Ukraine connected at the start of the Russian invasion, but Musk subsequently limited its use to prevent attacks on Crimea, citing escalation risks. Now it is being used to challenge the court ruling of a government, that of Brazil.
Instead, Musk shows unusual deference to Chinawhich contrasts with his indifferent, if not defiant, attitude towards other political leaders. He mocks Brazilian justice in X. He personally assists the Chinese government with a lightning trip to BeijingTesla's dependence on the US is causing a headache in Washington over concerns about technology transfer.
The Brazilian case has been the trigger for something else. Its confrontation with the Brazilian government exemplifies how it defies state authorities without hesitation. Doing so under the guise of freedom of expression, in addition to not adhering to the facts, clashes with regulatory efforts in Europe, the United States and other regions.
All this makes Musk an unpredictable geopolitical agent.His interventions in conflicts such as Ukraine and Gaza have generated both support and criticism. Governments see how a tycoon known for his spontaneity is acting unilaterally in conflicts and disputes.
Musk presents himself as a champion of free speech and innovation, but he is also a particularly influential businessman who likes to play with geopolitical fire, without much regard for democratic institutions and the established international order.
It is another type of actor on the world stage.a tycoon who challenges and sometimes surpasses the power of traditional states. His influence is undeniably innovative, but it also raises questions about global governance in the digital age. And no one knows how to answer them.
Featured image | Xataka with Midjourney
